Ethanol Incentives Contribute to Gulf of Mexico Dead Zone
It looks like ethanol subsidies may impede efforts to reduce the size of the Dead Zone in the Gulf of Mexico. A draft report from the EPA Science Advisory Board says that ethanol subsidies could lead to a dramatic increase in nutrient loading in the Mississippi river basin, due to diverting cropland to corn production.
Recent energy policies, combined with pre-existing crop subsidies, tax policies, global market conditions and trade barriers all provide economic incentives for conversion of retired and other cropland to corn production for use in ethanol production. Such conversions could lead to corn production on an additional 16 million acres…
The Dead Zone, an area in which there isn’t enough dissolved oxygen to support aquatic life, has been measured in the Gulf of Mexico since 1985. It’s caused by agricultural runoff overenriching the waters at the end of the Mississippi River - the downstream effect of millions of acres of intensely fertilized crops. Nitrogen and phosphorous, intended for corn but ending up in the river, make their way to the Gulf causing excessive phytoplankton production. In the process, all available oxygen is used up (hypoxia), and marine life has to move out or suffocate.
It turns out that the greater Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin (MARB) drains a grand total of 40% of the contiguous United States. The cumulative effect of all this runnoff creates a Dead Zone approximatly 20,500 sq. km. - roughly the size of the state of New Jersey.
To address this issue, the Science Advisory board recommends a 45% reduction in nitrogen and phosphorous fluxes from farmland. Unfortunately, recent trends pushing corn-based biofuels are not exactly aligned with this strategy:
Certain aspects of the nation’s current agricultural and energy policies are at odds with the goals of hypoxia reduction and improving water quality. . .[A]n emerging national strategy on renewable fuels has granted economic incentives to corn-based ethanol production.
Without some change to the current structure of economic incentives favoring corn-based ethanol, N[itrogen] loadings to the MARB from increased corn production could increase dramatically in coming years, rather than decreasing, as needed…
The alternative is cellulosic ethanol and avoiding corn-based fuels altogether:
Alternatively, the use of perennial crops and other feedstocks for cellulosic ethanol requires a more complex refining process that produces more net energy and results in lower fertilization and thus less nutrient runoff than corn-based ethanol.
The Dead Zone in the Gulf of Mexico is a symptom our farming practices, and converting cropland to grow fuel will only exacerbate the problem. This is just another chapter in the corn-based ethanol saga. The EPA’s Science Advisory Board will vote on approval of the draft report in December.
Green Car Congress: EPA Science Advisory Board Suggests Revisions to Ethanol Incentives Necessary to Reduce Gulf of Mexico “Dead Zone”
Science Advisory Board (SAB) Hypoxia Panel Draft Advisory Report
Tags: agriculture, Alternative Fuels, Automobiles, Biology and Biodiversity, corn, dead zone, Environment, EPA, Ethanol, farm subsidies, Food Production, Gulf of Mexico, hypoxia, runoff, Science Advisory Board, Science News, subsidies
- Uncategorized

October 21st, 2007 at 10:55 am
Ethanol really isn’t the answer. It is just a politically acceptable quick fix. Everywhere you look there are issues with this solution (limited production efficiency, exacerbation of existing agricultural policy issues, impacts on third world hunger - the list goes on).
It is time that we moved away from easy quick fixes and started to be a bit more imaginative about how we are going to solve our current energy / carbon issues.
October 22nd, 2007 at 3:29 am
I am sure you have heard of the much needed energy bill that Congress is working on passing. It contains two major history-changing provisions (a fuel economy standard of 35 mpg and a renewable electricity standard of 15%) that would end our Nation’s security-threatening dependence on Middle East oil, stop our money from flowing to terrorists, and keep our dollars at home growing the American economy. But lobbyists are working hard to tear the bill apart.
I am working with a coalition to make sure the energy bill doesn’t get derailed. We need your help in making sure that the final bill makes America stronger and more secure. Go to http://www.energybill2007.org and sign our petition. Tell Congress: don’t back down.
October 22nd, 2007 at 2:25 pm
Great points Mark!
Unregistered, the 35 mpg standard may be out of reach as a rule unless everyone agrees to drive tiny, light-weight cars. Please don’t take my pick-up. It may be useful to watch our responses to the alliances that China and Russia are making with the Middle East’s oil producers to see where the energy bill goes.
April 10th, 2008 at 4:44 pm
[...] ethanol and Malaysian palm biodiesel have substantive negative impacts (like deforestation, waterway pollution) and questionable benefits. But they are completely different than US-grown soybean biodiesel or [...]